I’m calling BS on the Wall Street Journal’s latest hit piece about Trump and Epstein. They’re claiming Trump wrote a birthday letter to Epstein in 2003, featuring a drawing of a naked woman with the name “Donald” signed as her pubic hair. But here’s the thing—they don’t show the actual letter. No image, no forensic proof, just typed excerpts and anonymous sourcing. That’s not journalism. That’s narrative warfare.

The letter was allegedly part of a birthday album compiled by Ghislaine Maxwell for Epstein’s 50th birthday—a leather-bound book filled with messages, poems, and illustrations from Epstein’s inner circle. According to the Journal, Trump’s letter included a typewritten note framed by a hand-drawn nude sketch. But again—no image, no authentication, and no clarity on who actually wrote or drew it.

Let’s be real: “Donald” is a common name. That squiggly signature could belong to anyone. And the fact that they won’t release the actual document makes the entire story feel engineered.

Even Trump’s own Vice President, JD Vance, called the Wall Street Journal story “complete and utter bulls---.” And I agree. If it’s real, show the letter. Otherwise, it’s just another distraction.

I’ve been skeptical of Trump ever since Operation Warp Speed, and I do believe there’s a Trump-Epstein connection—but not the way they’re spinning it. Whitney Webb’s reporting points to financial crimes, intelligence ties, and institutional protection. That’s the real story. Not some cartoonish sex scandal designed to bury the deeper truth.

This is how they operate: drop a salacious claim, let it spread, and bury the actual architecture of elite immunity beneath the noise. I’m not here for the static. I’m here to defend the signal.

I am not a propaganda agent for Republicans or Demoncrats. I am a disciple of the truth—and the truth shall set you free.

Truther Odyssey doesn’t chase headlines—we decode them.

Seeking truth in a world full of disinformation and indoctrination.